Ask Nigeria Header Logo

Reps reject bill on political qualifications

Photo of author

By Abraham Adekunle

Deliberations on educational qualifications for political officeholders.

Recently, Nigeria’s House of Representatives was in a debate session over a proposed bill seeking to amend the minimum educational requirements for individuals vying for the positions of President and Vice-President. Sponsored by Rep. Adewunmi Onanuga of the All Progressives Congress (APC) representing Ogun State, the bill aimed to elevate the minimum standard from a primary school certificate to a university degree. Onanuga, in her presentation of the bill’s general principles, argued passionately for the need to modernize Nigeria’s political landscape by raising the bar for educational qualifications. She contended that in an era where knowledge and expertise are paramount, relying on a basic school leaving certificate as the minimum requirement for political office is no longer tenable.

Instead, she proposed that a university degree or its equivalent should be the new threshold, aligning Nigeria’s standards with those of other progressive nations. Support for the bill was robust, with several members of the House voicing their endorsement during the debate. Rep. Babajimi Benson, also of the APC and representing Ogun State, expressed incredulity at the notion of allowing individuals without formal education to ascend to the highest echelons of political power. He emphasized the critical role that academic qualifications play in shaping competent leadership and driving national development.

What should be the education prerequisite for Nigerian leaders?

Similarly, Rep. Julius Ihonvbere of the APC representing Edo State emphasized the imperative of knowledge in today’s global landscape. He argued that in a world where information and expertise are prized commodities, Nigeria cannot afford to have leaders who lack the requisite educational background to navigate complex challenges effectively. Ihonvbere advocated for extending the educational requirement to cover not only the President and Vice-President but also members of the National Assembly, citing the need for well-educated policymakers to craft informed legislation. Echoing these sentiments, Rep. Leke Abejide of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) representing Kogi State underscored the urgency of aligning Nigeria’s standards with global best practices. He cautioned against the perils of appointing under qualified individuals to key political positions, warning that such decisions could have far-reaching consequences for the nation’s future. Abejide emphasized the importance of educational qualifications in upholding meritocracy and ensuring competent governance.

In contrast to the overwhelming support for the bill, there were dissenting voices within the House. Malam Aliyu Madaki of the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) representing Kano State offered a contrarian perspective, arguing against the notion that leadership qualities should be determined solely by one’s level of education. Madaki contended that true leadership transcends academic credentials and encompasses qualities such as integrity, empathy, and vision. He advocated for a more inclusive approach to governance that recognizes and nurtures the diverse talents and experiences of all Nigerians, irrespective of their educational background.

Lawmakers debate education requirement for political leaders.

Rep. Bashir Sokoto of the APC representing Sokoto State echoed Madaki’s sentiments, expressing concern about the potential exclusion of Nigerians from marginalized backgrounds who may not have had the opportunity to pursue higher education. Sokoto emphasized the importance of promoting inclusivity in political processes and ensuring that all citizens have equal access to participation, regardless of their educational attainment. Amidst the impassioned arguments and divergent viewpoints, Rep. Ahmed Jaha of the APC representing Borno State raised additional concerns about the potential repercussions of implementing the bill. Jaha cautioned against adopting measures that could exacerbate existing inequalities and marginalize certain segments of society. He questioned the efficacy of using educational qualifications as a sole criterion for assessing leadership potential, highlighting the need for a more holistic approach that considers diverse factors such as experience, character, and integrity.

Deputy Speaker Rep. Benjamin Kalu, presiding over the session, ultimately decided to postpone further deliberation on the bill in light of the heated debate and the complexity of the issues at hand. Kalu’s decision reflected the recognition that any changes to the educational qualifications for political officeholders must be approached with caution and thorough consideration to ensure that they serve the best interests of the nation as a whole. The debate over educational qualifications for political officeholders in Nigeria is not a new phenomenon but rather a reflection of the broader challenges facing the country’s political system.

Related Article: Reps vow to utilize recovered funds well

Nigeria, like many other developing nations, grapples with issues of governance, accountability, and inclusivity, all of which intersect with the question of who is qualified to lead. As the nation continues to navigate these complex issues, it must strike a delicate balance between upholding meritocracy and ensuring that its political processes are accessible and inclusive to all citizens. Moreover, the debate over educational qualifications for political officeholders underscores broader questions about the role of education in Nigerian society. Nigeria, with its diverse population and rich cultural heritage, faces significant challenges in providing equitable access to quality education for all its citizens. The country’s educational system has long been plagued by issues such as inadequate infrastructure, teacher shortages, and disparities in access between urban and rural areas.

Related Link

Wikipedia: Website

The content on is given for general information only and does not constitute a professional opinion, and users should seek their own legal/professional advice. There is data available online that lists details, facts and further information not listed in this post, please complete your own investigation into these matters and reach your own conclusion. accepts no responsibility for losses from any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of content contained in this website and/or other websites which may be linked to this website.

Fact Checking Tool -