Ask Nigeria Header Logo

Remove tariff on gas vessels — Expert says

Photo of author

By Abdulwasiu Usman

Pursuit of a gas-centric economy is jeopardized by the high tariff.

CEO of Gas Initiative Nigeria Mr. Taiwo Odediran has called on FG to remove the duty on imported compressed gas containers. At a press conference on Thursday in Ilorin, Kwara state, Odediran claimed that the tariff (67.5 percent) as stated under the Customs and Excise Tariff, is inconsistent with the gas economy goal of the administration of President Bola Tinubu. To him, the country’s efforts to develop its gas economy have been largely stunted by the recently updated Import Adjustment Tax of 40% on containers of Compressed/Liquefied Gas, bringing the total tariff charged for this item to 67.5 percent.

According to him, it would be an understatement to assert that the tariff is bogus and exorbitant, thereby necessitating expeditious reassessment. The existence of a gas utility is contingent upon the presence of steel pressure vessels for the containment and storage of said gas. Gas containers or tanks are an indispensable component of any gas utility infrastructure. He opined that the incumbent administration’s deliberate pursuit of a gas-centric economy is being jeopardized by the impractical tariff imposed on the Storage Tanks, a pivotal element of Gas Utility as previously mentioned.

Generating revenue is what birthed imposition of tariffs.

Currently, the Customs and Excise Tariffs (CET) rate for gas containers and storage is 67.5 percent. Included in these are a 20 percent ID fee, a 7.5 percent VAT, and a 49% IAT. Odediran remarked that stakeholders in the gas industry are surprised that the gas storage tank, a key component of President Tinubu’s gas economy aims, might be subject to the highest taxes in the entire system of customs and excise levies in the country. He pointed out that countries’ economies are no longer being propell positively by bogus levies on such a product.

In his view, tariffs have three fundamental purposes which are to function as a means of generating revenue, safeguard domestic industries and to rectify trade imbalances which is the punitive role. The revenue function can be attributed to the inherent correlation between tariffs and the provision of financial resources to governments. Historically, generating revenue is what birthed imposition of tariffs. However, it’s significance has been diminished by our economic development and the establishment of a more sophisticated Systematic Domestic Tax framework.

No reason for big investment on gas containment production.

He mentioned Japan as an example of an industrialized country that, in just a few years, generated around one trillion Yen in tariff revenue, which is arguably regarded to be less than two percent of its Total Tax Revenues. Odediran remarked that, in a Gas-Based Economy, Nigeria would benefit more from the import duties on Gas Utility Facilities and equipment like storage and containers if the bogus charges were eliminated or decreased. The tariff, he continued, is a policy instrument for safeguarding home industries by adjusting the competitive environment for goods in a way that downsides competitive imports.

Nigeria is not yet successful in steel production as there is no mill in the country that produces steel sheets, which is the only material capable of making pressure vessels for gas containment or storage. We need a thriving gas industry, he said, but until then, there is little reason to make substantial domestic investments in pressure vessel production for gas containment or storage at the current absurd tariff of 67.5 percent. It’s also unexpected that compressed or liquefied gas containers, which fall within the CET Article of Iron and Steel Chapter, are at the highest peak of taxes at the rate of 67.5 percent.

Attaining the task is arduous with the 67.5 percent tariff.

Moreover, he asserted that this occurrence must have been either inadvertently executed or orchestrated by economic saboteurs to impede the sustained influx of investments in gas infrastructure. It is readily discernible that if the presence of gas is available on the thoroughfares of Nigeria, the requisite vessels for its containment or storage must be conveniently obtainable. Nevertheless, attaining such a goal is an arduous task to achieve given the imposition of a tariff amounting to 67.5 percent on the importation of gas storage tanks, he said.

Related Link

Wikipedia: Website

The content on is given for general information only and does not constitute a professional opinion, and users should seek their own legal/professional advice. There is data available online that lists details, facts and further information not listed in this post, please complete your own investigation into these matters and reach your own conclusion. accepts no responsibility for losses from any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of content contained in this website and/or other websites which may be linked to this website.

Fact Checking Tool -

5 1 vote
Rate This Article
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 month ago

Remove tariff on gas vessels — Expert says. – Pursuit of a gas-centric economy is jeopardized by the high tariff. – Express your point of view.

1 month ago

We should get rid of the gas vessel tax. The government can assist in locating affordable oil and gas for the people the price of the gas is high and to expensive for people to purchase necessary things should be done to lessen things and make it easy

1 month ago

The results of this study on forest recovery in Nigeria are encouraging. It demonstrates how our woods can raise living standards and contribute to better health; it is important to concentrate on these positive effects and keep up efforts to maintain and restore the resources we possess for the sake of our people and the environment.

Adeoye Adegoke
Adeoye Adegoke
1 month ago

I completely agree with the expert’s recommendation to remove tariffs on gas vessels. The imposition of high tariffs poses a significant challenge to the pursuit of a gas-centric economy. By removing these tariffs, we can create a more favorable environment for the growth and development of the gas industry.
A gas-centric economy has numerous benefits, both in terms of energy security and economic growth. Natural gas is a cleaner and more sustainable energy source compared to traditional fossil fuels like coal and oil. It emits lower levels of greenhouse gases, contributing to the reduction of carbon emissions and combating climate change. Embracing a gas-centric economy can help us transition towards a more sustainable and environmentally friendly energy system.
Removing tariffs on gas vessels would encourage investment in the gas industry, attract new players, and foster competition. This would result in increased efficiency, improved technology, and ultimately lower costs for consumers. It would also incentivize the development of domestic gas production, reducing our reliance on imported gas and enhancing energy security.
To ensure a successful transition to a gas-centric economy, it is crucial to address the barriers hindering its growth, such as high tariffs. This requires a collaborative effort between the government, industry stakeholders, and experts to develop and implement policies that promote the removal of these barriers. Open and transparent discussions among all stakeholders will be essential to address concerns, assess the potential impacts, and arrive at a consensus on the best way forward.

In conclusion, removing tariffs on gas vessels is a crucial step towards the pursuit of a gas-centric economy. It would unlock the full potential of the gas industry, promote economic growth, and contribute to a more sustainable and environmentally friendly energy system. Let’s work together to create an enabling environment that supports the growth and development of the gas industry for the benefit of our economy and future generations. 💡🌍🚢