The Federal Government’s proposal to implement toll charges on the upcoming Lagos-Calabar Coastal Road has sparked a whirlwind of reactions, with concerns raised about the potential impact on commuters, the economy, and broader infrastructure development strategies. The proposed toll fees, averaging ₦3,000 per toll gate, have drawn both support and criticism from various quarters, igniting a debate that delves into the intricacies of funding major infrastructure projects and balancing public interests with economic imperatives. At the forefront of this debate is the Minister of Works, Senator Dave Umahi, who has staunchly defended the tolling proposal. Umahi’s argument revolves around the need for cost recovery on what he describes as a capital-intensive project.
According to him, the toll charges are based on an estimated average daily passage of 50,000 vehicles and a calculated 15-year cost recovery plan. He also mentioned varying toll rates for different types of vehicles, with cars expected to pay around ₦1,500 and trucks ₦5,000, averaging out to the proposed ₦3,000 per vehicle. However, this announcement has not been well-received by many stakeholders. The Coalition of United Political Parties (CUPP) has vehemently opposed any toll above ₦300, arguing that higher tolls would exacerbate the financial burden on citizens, especially considering existing economic challenges such as inflation and rising utility costs. Chief Peter Ameh, the General Secretary of CUPP, emphasized the need for transparency in project costs and proper oversight to prevent over-invoicing and financial mismanagement, echoing concerns shared by several advocacy groups and opposition parties.
Concerns against the proposed tolling on the road.
Similarly, the Labour Party (LP) criticized the tolling plan, stating that it reflects a pattern of policies that burden ordinary Nigerians while benefiting a few. LP’s National Publicity Secretary, Obiora Ifoh, highlighted the already existing economic challenges faced by Nigerians, including rising inflation and electricity tariffs, questioning the rationale behind additional toll charges that could further strain household budgets. On the other hand, the All Progressives Congress (APC) has defended the tolling proposal, citing the need for cost recovery on such a significant infrastructure project. Dr. Ajibola Basiru, the National Secretary of APC, mentioned alternative routes for motorists unwilling to pay tolls, emphasizing the importance of infrastructure funding and the role toll gates play in generating revenue for maintenance and development.
Luxury bus operators have expressed grave concerns about the potential impact of toll charges on their operations and passengers. Emeka Mamah, Managing Director of Ifesinachi Transport, criticized the government’s approach, questioning why the contract was awarded without competitive bidding and expressing worries about increased costs for passengers that could ultimately lead to reduced demand for their services. Despite the criticism, some stakeholders have expressed support for toll gates as a means to fund road maintenance and development. Alhaji Mumakai Unagha, a prominent figure, welcomed the return of toll gates across the country, acknowledging the benefits for neglected coastal areas and urging cooperation from the public in ensuring the timely completion and maintenance of crucial infrastructure projects.
Controversy surrounding the government’s proposal.
Of course, the controversy surrounding the tolling proposal goes beyond mere financial considerations. It reflects broader concerns about infrastructure development strategies, funding mechanisms, and the delicate balance between economic viability and public welfare. Infrastructure projects of this scale often require substantial investment, and tolling has been a common method used globally to recover costs and ensure ongoing maintenance. However, the key issue lies in how tolling is implemented and its impact on various segments of society. Critics argue that excessive toll charges can disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and businesses, leading to increased transportation costs, reduced economic activity, and social inequities. They also raise questions about the transparency of project costs, competitive bidding processes, and the overall accountability of government spending in infrastructure development.
Proponents of tolling, on the other hand, point to its necessity in funding critical infrastructure projects that benefit society at large. They argue that without adequate funding sources such as toll revenues, governments may struggle to maintain and expand essential transportation networks, leading to deteriorating infrastructure and hampered economic growth. One aspect often overlooked in these debates is the potential for tolling to incentivize alternative modes of transportation, such as public transit, cycling, and walking. By imposing tolls on certain roads, governments can encourage more sustainable and efficient transportation choices, reducing traffic congestion, emissions, and infrastructure maintenance costs in the long run. The case of the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Road represents a microcosm of larger infrastructure challenges facing Nigeria and many developing countries. Balancing the need for modern, well-maintained transportation networks with the affordability and accessibility concerns of the populace requires careful planning, public consultation, and transparent decision-making processes.
Related Article: Lagos State to demolish Landmark Resort
In addition to tolling, other funding mechanisms such as public-private partnerships (PPPs), government grants, and international financing can play significant roles in infrastructure development. However, each approach comes with its own set of advantages, challenges, and considerations that must be carefully evaluated based on the specific context and objectives of each project. As discussions and debates continue around the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Road tolling proposal, stakeholders emphasize the importance of transparency, accountability, and equitable solutions that prioritize the public interest while ensuring sustainable funding for critical infrastructure projects. Finding the right balance between economic viability, social equity, and environmental sustainability remains a complex yet essential task for policymakers, industry experts, and communities affected by major infrastructure initiatives.
Related Link
Wikipedia: Website
