In 2020, the Trump administration raised National Security concerns about TikTok’s ownership by the Chinese business ByteDance, which led to the potential ban in the US being a major topic of political and public discussion. Concerns about espionage and privacy concerns were raised when the U.S. government claimed that TikTok presented a risk of user data being obtained by the Chinese government. Threats of app store deletions and limitations on transactions with ByteDance were added to the situation as it became more serious.
Eventually, an agreement was reached to reorganise TikTok’s business in the United States, and Oracle and Walmart began negotiating to acquire shares in a new company called TikTok Global. The argument highlighted tensions between the United States and China over digital Technology and data sovereignty, even though the app was never formally blocked. In the statement, TikTok emphasised its attempts to manage the intricacies of the situation while arguing that its existence in the United States is essential for both economic opportunities and free speech. As of 2023, the app was still being scrutinised, with federal Legislation being considered and certain states adopting partial restrictions.
Nig. Gov’t defended the prohibition of X as a way to uphold social order.
Following the removal of a contentious tweet by President Muhammadu Buhari that was judged to be in violation of the platform’s policies, X was banned from Nigeria for several months in June 2021. In response, the Nigerian government suspended X on the grounds that it permitted the dissemination of dangerous content and false information. The prohibition has significant ramifications: Digital communication was severely disrupted in Nigeria, one of Africa’s biggest Social Media markets, impacting public discourse, activism, and companies. In order to get around restrictions, users resorted to virtual private networks (VPNs), highlighting the platform’s vital function in daily life.
After X consented to fulfil some government requirements, including setting up a local office and filing taxes in Nigeria, the prohibition was lifted in January 2022. The government defended the prohibition as a way to uphold social order and police regulatory compliance, while critics saw it as an assault on free expression. The situations of TikTok and X highlight parallels and differences in the ways that governments regulate online spaces. National officials presented both cases as attempts to preserve sovereignty, whether it was regulatory compliance in Nigeria or Data Security in the United States.
Critics have characterised the prohibition as a type of censorship.
Though the reasons differ, TikTok’s problems in the US stem from privacy issues and geopolitical rivalry, whereas X’s suspension in Nigeria was linked to political Protest and content moderation issues. Both situations highlight the conflict between governments and multinational internet firms over accountability, regulation, and striking a balance between free expression and the interests of the country. Free speech was significantly impacted by the US and Nigerian bans on TikTok and X, respectively, underscoring the brittleness of digital platforms for expression. The planned U.S. ban on TikTok sparked worries about possible government overreach in controlling access and content.
TikTok has more than 170 million users in the US and has developed into a platform for small business marketing, advocacy, and creativity. Critics have characterised the prohibition as a type of censorship masquerading as a national Security precaution because it would have interfered with these activities. In a similar vein, public speech was directly repressed when X was suspended by the Nigerian government. When individuals protested police violence through movements like #EndSARS, the platform was an essential instrument for political activism. The aforementioned examples demonstrate how government activities that target internet platforms can border on censorship.
Related Article: Social media influence on Nigerian politics
Despite TikTok’s immense popularity and few proof of misconduct, the move to ban the app in the United States indicated a desire to censor information for political reasons. TikTok itself stressed in its statement how crucial it is to oppose capricious censorship in order to uphold the First Amendment. The extended X ban in Nigeria was a clear illustration of state-imposed censorship, which limited access to discourse and information while weakening democratic values. The international outcry against these restrictions highlights a rising worry that governments would use security and disinformation concerns as an excuse to stifle digital liberties.