The Federal Government is heading for a potential confrontation with retired military personnel over a controversial bill to address their Welfare and representation. The dispute escalated on Friday as indications emerged that the retirees were planning to shut down the Ministry of Defence in protest. The dispute addresses the proposed bill, under review by the Defence Headquarters and the Ministry of Justice, which includes provisions mandating leadership roles based on rank, such as a Major General as national chairman, a Colonel as state chairman, and a Major as local government chairman.
While the government sees this structure as a way to maintain military hierarchy and discipline, military retirees argue it is an imposition that undermines democratic representation. Their frustration is compounded by delays in finalising the bill and the Ministry of Defence’s perceived insistence on implementing its provisions despite widespread opposition. The call for a new veterans’ organisation stems from dissatisfaction with the Nigerian Legion, originally established to cater to the welfare of retired military personnel. Over the years, the Legion has faced criticism for becoming a self-serving institution, allegedly compromised by significant civilian infiltration and lacking accountability.
Proposal for the veterans federation of Nigeria.
This inefficacy has led to the proliferation of independent veterans’ associations, such as the Coalition of Concerned Veterans, which has stepped in to address the needs of ex-servicemen and women. Many retirees advocate establishing the Veterans Federation of Nigeria (VFN) to address the systemic issues plaguing veterans’ welfare. This proposed body aims to unite all ex-military under a single umbrella organisation where leaders would be democratically elected, ensuring fair representation and accountability. Proponents of the VFN argue that this structure would empower veterans to manage their affairs, restore trust, and bridge the gap left by the Nigerian Legion.
However, the delay in finalising the bill and including contentious provisions have fuelled discontent among ex-military. They have warned that they are prepared to stage nationwide protests if their concerns are not addressed. On the government’s part, the federal government has reiterated its commitment to improving the welfare of ex-military through the Ministry of Defence. Defence Minister Mohammed Badaru Abubakar has emphasised that the proposed bill is part of efforts to enhance veterans’ well-being. According to the government, the rank-based leadership structure reflects military traditions and ensures that individuals with substantial experience and understanding of military operations occupy key positions.
Lessons from international veterans’ organisations.
In the United States, organisations like the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars operate with a democratic structure where leaders are elected by their peers. These organisations are vital in advocating for veterans’ benefits, providing community support, and engaging in policy discussions. Similarly, the World Veterans Federation (WVF), an international body representing 172 veterans’ organisations across 121 countries, adopts a democratic framework for leadership appointments. This model ensures fair representation while respecting the diverse military backgrounds of its members.
From these examples, Nigerian veterans argue that the proposed VFN should embody similar principles to promote inclusivity and accountability. Meanwhile, establishing the VFN would require careful planning to ensure its economic and administrative viability. The government would need to allocate resources for the new organisation’s operations, staffing, and programs tailored to the needs of military retirees. Additionally, steps must be taken to avoid bureaucratic redundancies and conflicts with existing institutions like the Nigerian Legion. Achieving this balance will be crucial to the success of the VFN and its acceptance among retirees.
Related Article: Military Retirees Protest Payment of Benefits
Lastly, the dispute underscores the complexities of reforming veterans’ welfare systems. On the other hand, balancing hierarchical traditions with democratic representation, addressing historical grievances, and ensuring economic and administrative feasibility are critical challenges that must be navigated. By learning from international best practices and promoting inclusive dialogue, the federal government and military retirees can work towards a solution that upholds the dignity and welfare of those who have dedicated their lives to serving the nation.