Northern Nigeria faces a pivotal moment as the proposed federal Tax amendment causes debate among lawmakers, governors, and stakeholders. These reforms, introduced by President Bola Tinubu, aim to simplify tax administration, promote fairness, and stimulate economic growth. While proponents see them as vital for national development, critics in the North voice concerns about potential economic disadvantages for the region. The controversy stems from Northern Nigeria’s distinct economic realities. Dominated by Agriculture and informal trading, the region’s economic structure differs from the industrialised South’s.
Some northern lawmakers and governors fear the modification could further widen these disparities, particularly if adjustments are not made to address local concerns. One primary concern among Northern leaders is the Value-added Tax (VAT) structure. With a consumption-based model, the industrialised South may reap higher revenues due to its robust corporate and commercial sectors, leaving Northern states with less. Additionally, as agriculture accounts for much of the region’s economy, policies favouring urban industries may not adequately reflect their economic base.
Potential benefits and challenges for the region’s economy.
There is also apprehension about potential disruptions in Revenue sharing between the federal and state governments. The proposed consolidation of tax agencies might centralise revenue collection, potentially reducing the financial autonomy of states. Governors from the North argue that such moves could undermine the region’s ability to fund critical Infrastructure and services. Despite these concerns, the tax adjustment holds significant promise for the North. Key provisions include exemptions from Companies Income Tax (CIT) for businesses with annual turnovers below ₦50 million and VAT exemptions for essential goods and services, including agricultural products.
These measures aim to relieve the financial burden on small businesses and farmers, potentially creating economic activity in the informal sector. Progressive taxation, where high-income earners contribute more while low-income earners are exempt, is another positive aspect of the amendment. This aligns well with the socioeconomic realities of Northern Nigeria, where many residents fall within low-income brackets. By reducing the billing burden on vulnerable groups, the improvement could enhance household incomes and drive local consumption. While the proposed reforms have sparked division among northern senators, there is a growing call for dialogue and consensus.
Closing divides and exploring pathways to success in its implementation.
Furthermore, lawmakers and stakeholders argue that the current amendment draft includes undefined areas that need amendment. Forming a special Senate committee to collaborate with the Attorney General of the Federation is a step toward addressing these issues. Amidst the political debate, there is an acknowledgement that outright rejection of the change could backfire. Many northern lawmakers believe constructive engagement is essential to address the region’s concerns adequately. They hope to secure amendments that reflect the North’s unique economic structure by participating in the process.
Several critical steps must be taken for the amendment to benefit the North. First, the federal government must engage stakeholders at all levels, including state governors, local leaders, and business representatives, to ensure equitable and inclusive reforms. Input from these groups is crucial for creating policies that balance regional disparities. Second, public Education campaigns are needed to raise awareness about the changes and their benefits. With lower Literacy rates in parts of the North, targeted efforts to inform citizens and businesses about their charge obligations and exemptions will be key to ensuring compliance and maximising the benefits of the reforms.
Related Article: Tinubu’s tax reforms to ease economic burden
Finally, addressing the region’s Security challenges is paramount. Insecure environments hinder Economic Growth and investment, making it difficult for businesses to thrive even with reduced bill burdens. Federal and state governments must prioritise stability to create a conducive environment for the reforms to take effect. The proposed bill restructuring represents both a challenge and an opportunity for the country. While the region’s unique economic realities pose hurdles to implementation, the potential benefits are substantial. By reducing financial barriers for small businesses, promoting fairness in charge contributions, and encouraging investment, the reforms could pave the way for greater economic inclusion and sustainability.