The United States’ decision to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) could have far-reaching implications for global health, especially for countries in the sub-Saharan Africa region, like Nigeria, where foreign aid is essential to providing healthcare. Historically, the US has been one of the largest contributors to WHO, providing nearly 15% of its total budget before the withdrawal. In the 2020–2021 biennium, the U.S. contributed approximately $681 million to WHO, accounting for about 9.7% of the organization’s total funding during that period. This funding supported various global health initiatives, including disease control, health system strengthening, and emergency responses.
For Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa, the decision presents serious issues with relation to financing, healthcare facilities, and disease prevention initiatives. Nigeria’s complex health issues, such as preventing infectious diseases, lowering maternal and infant mortality, and expanding access to basic healthcare, are largely addressed through international collaborations. It is perceived that the U.S. exit from WHO could result in a substantial financing shortfall, which might have an impact on the organization’s ability to support health initiatives in nations like Nigeria.
Threats to Nigeria’s fight against infectious diseases.
Moreover, the reduction in financial resources may hinder ongoing and future health initiatives, emphasizing the need for alternative funding sources to sustain critical health services. One area of concern is Nigeria’s fight against infectious diseases. With the support of WHO, Nigeria has achieved notable progress in combating HIV/AIDS, polio, and malaria. However, the distribution of vaccines, disease surveillance programs, and the deployment of medical professionals in underprivileged and rural areas may be hampered by the US government’s decision.
This is particularly concerning for a nation where healthcare access is still unequal and where many communities depend on foreign groups to close important service delivery gaps. Furthermore, WHO is essential to the coordination of Public Health emergency responses in the country. The organization’s financial and technical aid has been crucial in treating the disease outbreak in Nigeria, including meningitis, cholera, and Lassa fever.The US’s withdrawal from the organization may limit WHO’s ability to respond quickly to crises of this nature, making Nigeria more vulnerable to outbreaks in the future.
Global funding gaps and Nigeria’s response strategy.
It could also have an impact on Nigeria’s attempts to improve its healthcare system. WHO has been a crucial collaborator in ensuring access to necessary medications, enhancing health policy, and training healthcare professionals. Lower funding might restrict the reach of these programs, which may impede Nigeria’s efforts to achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), which it has been working toward under WHO’s direction. The ruling also draws attention to a larger problem with global health governance and the way geopolitical conflicts can sabotage coordinated efforts.
By limiting WHO’s power and capacity to raise funds, the United States’ decision might put nations like Nigeria in a vulnerable position. As one of the most influential voices in Africa, Nigeria may need to promote more regional cooperation and alternate funding sources to lessen the effects of this scenario. While other countries and private donors may step in to fill the funding gap, the process is neither immediate nor guaranteed to meet the scale of what the US previously provided.
Related Article: WHO forecasts health staff shortage in Africa
In the meantime, Nigeria must navigate an uncertain global health environment, where the withdrawal of a key actor like the US may have a domino impact on efforts to prevent disease and provide healthcare. In order to lessen reliance on outside aid, Nigeria must immediately diversify its funding sources and fortify its domestic healthcare systems. At the same time, global leaders must recognize that health challenges transcend borders, and any weakening of multilateral institutions like WHO ultimately harms the most vulnerable populations, including those in Nigeria.