The Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has set out plans to engage in discussions with the federal government over the proposed removal of the Education tax, a move that has sparked widespread concern across the country. Prof. Victor Osodeke, the National President of ASUU, disclosed that the organization has written to the Senate President and the Presidency to express opposition to the measure. The union also plans to meet with the Ministers of Education to discuss this matter and other issues, such as the ongoing use of the Integrated Personnel and Payroll Information System (IPPIS), which ASUU maintains is inappropriate for educational institutions.
This proposal, which is a component of the Nigeria Tax Bill reform 2024, aims to reduce the Tertiary Education Trust Fund’s (TETFund) share of the education tax and ultimately eliminate it by 2030. According to ASUU, this action would seriously jeopardize public university financing for research, postgraduate education, and infrastructure. Since its founding, the TETFund has been a vital source of funding for Nigerian Higher Education for about 30 years, giving public universities, polytechnics, and institutes of education much-needed resources. Sources noted that the union sees the education tax as a lifeline for tertiary institutions, many of which are suffering from lack of funding, inadequate infrastructure, and poor staff remuneration.
Govt justified the idea as attempts to simplify taxes.
Leaders of ASUU believe that cutting off this funding source without a solid backup plan could cause academic standards to decline and further upend the educational system. However, the federal government has justified the idea as part of its attempts to simplify taxes and lessen the burden on businesses. Officials contend that the removal of the education tax would spur Economic Growth by enabling businesses to reinvest their profits back into the economy. They have also hinted at exploring other funding mechanisms to support tertiary education but have yet to provide concrete details on these alternatives.
Other education stakeholders have also strongly criticized the proposed elimination of the education tax, which is a crucial part of larger government fiscal changes. Many contend that such a move could have detrimental effects on Nigeria’s tertiary education system’s accessibility and quality. Critics argue that the already dire state of Nigeria’s higher education system would worsen if this funding source is eliminated without a competent substitute. Public tertiary institutions, which already struggle with inadequate learning facilities, overcrowded classrooms, and underfunding, mostly depend on the money offered by TETFund to stay afloat.
Many demands that the proposal should be reexamined.
Stakeholders worry that if this funding source is cut off, standards in tertiary institutions may continue to drop, making it extremely harder for these institutions to carry out their academic and research objectives. Many are demanding that the proposal should be carefully reexamined and that other alternatives be considered to not jeopardize Nigeria’s already precarious tertiary education system. To address the growing tension, both parties have agreed to meet in a bid to find common ground.
Discussions are expected to focus on ramifications of the tax reduction and possible ways to lessen its effects on the education sector. While government representatives will lay out their fiscal objectives and alternative plans, ASUU is expected to provide data and case studies highlighting the crucial role that the education tax plays in maintaining university operations. The outcome of these discussions may have a big impact on Nigeria’s higher education system. The whole academic community is closely monitoring the situation, as any reduction in funding could lead to increased tuition fees and additional financial strain on families.
Related Article: Education Tax will fund Student Loans – FIRS
Moreover, removing the tax could make it harder for the average Nigerian to access high-quality education by increasing the gap between public and private universities. Stakeholders from civil society, labor unions, and the Private Sector have also weighed in on the discussion, calling for transparency and inclusivity in the decision-making process. There is a growing consensus that reforms affecting education should prioritize the interests of students and the long term development goals of the nation.