The Kwara State Government has declared that all billboard and signage licences granted in 2024 are revoked, with enforcement starting next week. The Commissioner for Communications, Bolanle Olukoju, who also chairs the state’s Task Force Committee on Illegal Billboards and Signages, stated that the decision aligns with the government’s Urban Renewal Programme aimed at improving the state’s visual appeal. Authorities will begin identifying and removing unauthorised billboards, posters, and light pole banners, while owners of non-compliant structures have been advised to take them down voluntarily. The government also confirmed that no new registrations or renewals of billboard licences would be processed until further notice, as it finalises a new regulatory framework for outdoor advertising.
This revocation has raised concerns among businesses and advertisers who depend on billboards for visibility, as many had already paid for long-term placements. Companies that have invested in billboard advertising now face financial risks, particularly those that rely heavily on outdoor advertising to reach customers. Small and medium enterprises, which often lack the resources to transition to more expensive digital or print advertising, may be disproportionately affected. With no clear timeline for the introduction of a new regulatory framework, businesses are left uncertain about when they can resume billboard placements, potentially leading to disruptions in marketing strategies. The lack of consultation with advertisers before the decision was announced has also sparked criticism, with some arguing that a phased approach would have been more effective in addressing regulatory concerns.
Government must ensure transparency and fairness in enforcement.
In addition to business concerns, the sudden policy shift raises broader questions about regulatory consistency and urban planning in Kwara State. Similar abrupt measures in other parts of Nigeria have led to legal disputes, as affected businesses seek compensation for lost investments. If the government does not provide clarity on how the new framework will be structured, there is a risk that advertisers and billboard operators will challenge the decision in court. The absence of clear guidelines also creates uncertainty for urban planners, who rely on outdoor advertising regulations to maintain order in commercial districts. A well-structured policy could help achieve the government’s vision of a more organised and aesthetically pleasing urban environment, but the lack of stakeholder engagement may hinder its implementation.
Moreover, the timing of the revocation has also led to speculation about possible political motives, as billboards play a significant role in political messaging. With no immediate plans to reinstate licences, there are concerns that the measure could be selectively enforced, restricting the ability of certain groups to communicate their messages ahead of the next election cycle. Political parties and advocacy groups often rely on billboards to reach a broad audience, especially in areas where access to digital media is limited. The government insists that the move is purely regulatory, but in a political climate where control over public messaging is crucial, the decision is likely to be viewed with suspicion. Without transparency in the enforcement process, accusations of bias could undermine public trust in the policy.
Removal of billboards could reduce access to important information.
Furthermore, for residents, the removal of unauthorised billboards may lead to a neater and less cluttered cityscape, but it could also reduce access to important public information. Billboards often serve as platforms for government announcements, Public Health campaigns, and social awareness initiatives. In a state where internet penetration is still developing, many people rely on traditional media for information. If a new framework is not introduced swiftly, there could be a communication gap, particularly for rural residents who may not have alternative means of accessing public messages. While the government’s goal of improving urban aesthetics is valid, an abrupt removal of billboards without an immediate replacement strategy could leave the public underserved.
The government’s ability to enforce this policy fairly and implement a transparent licensing process will determine its long-term success. If handled properly, the regulatory overhaul could lead to a more structured advertising industry, reducing the prevalence of illegal billboards and ensuring compliance with urban planning guidelines. However, if the process remains unclear and businesses are left without viable alternatives, the state could face resistance from advertisers, potential legal challenges, and economic losses. A balanced approach that includes stakeholder engagement and a clear roadmap for implementation would help mitigate disruptions while achieving the government’s urban development goals.
Related Article: Kwara equips 700 farmers with advanced skills
Overall, this development highlights the broader challenges of urban governance in Nigeria, where policy shifts often occur without sufficient consultation with affected stakeholders. Striking a balance between enforcing regulations and ensuring that businesses, political groups, and the public are not unfairly disadvantaged requires careful planning. While the government has made its position clear, it must also demonstrate transparency in implementing the new framework. Engaging with advertisers, urban planners, and Civil Society organisations could help create a more inclusive policy that benefits both the state and its residents.