Amnesty International has strongly endorsed the Nigerian government’s latest move to stop the $1.3 billion transaction involving Shell Petroleum Development Company’s onshore oilfields and Renaissance Group. The Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) pointed to the buyer’s lack of adequate qualifications to oversee these assets as the rationale behind this decision, reinforcing the government’s dedication to environmental responsibility in the Niger Delta region. This choice demonstrates an increasing call for ethical divestment approaches and underscores Nigeria’s commitment to safeguarding the Welfare of its communities and natural surroundings.
During a recent press event in Port Harcourt, Mark Dummett, who heads the Business and Human Rights sector at Amnesty International, emphasised that any global oil corporation planning to withdraw from the Niger Delta needs to tackle its human rights and environmental repercussions. Dummett remarked that for years, the Niger Delta has suffered from environmental harm and contamination stemming from Oil Spills and the indifference of oil corporations. Before they can sell off their assets, Shell and other companies need to acknowledge the lasting impacts of their operations on the local community.
Companies must take responsibility before exiting the country.
On January 16, 2024, Shell made the announcement that it would be selling its Nigerian subsidiary, known as the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited (SPDC), to Renaissance, a consortium made up of four Nigerian exploration firms and one global energy organisation. This move by Shell indicates a wider strategy aimed at concentrating on more sustainable and lower-risk projects in various regions around the globe. Nonetheless, the finalisation of this agreement depended on the consent of the Nigerian government, which the NUPRC ultimately rejected.
In early April, the NUPRC introduced a framework for divestment designed to assist in obtaining ministerial approval for these deals, emphasising social and environmental responsibility. The framework consists of seven key points that set forth the standards for companies withdrawing from Nigeria, highlighting the importance of environmental stewardship, ongoing operations, and safeguarding human rights. The NUPRC’s decision to decline Renaissance’s proposal, pointing to insufficient competence in handling the assets and their environmental implications, underscores the commission’s dedication to prudent Regulation of Nigeria’s oil industry.
Environmental and human rights violations must be addressed.
For many years, Amnesty International has highlighted the environmental wrongs experienced by populations in regions where oil is extracted. Dummett’s comments echo Amnesty’s position that corporations are obligated to address environmental and human rights violations prior to withdrawal. It is essential for the government to hold Shell accountable for oil leaks, contaminated water, and harmed Agriculture in the Niger Delta, Dummett emphasised. Letting Shell sell off its assets without tackling these problems would result in lasting impacts on the area.
Over the years, the Niger Delta stands out as one of Nigeria’s most environmentally diverse areas, but it has experienced significant damage from years of oil drilling. Communities in the area contend with various problems, including polluted rivers, tainted farmland, and health concerns. Amnesty stated that Shell must not be allowed to withdraw unless it pledges to restore and clean up the affected regions, tackle the fundamental issues causing the environmental disaster, and guarantee that local communities are safeguarded from dangerous circumstances.
Related Article: Nigeria’s Oil Industry in a State of Decline
Lastly, the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission’s choice to deny Shell’s transaction with Renaissance Group sets a precedent in the nation’s oil and gas regulatory framework. By enforcing responsible divestment protocols, the Nigerian government signals that international corporations must address their environmental and societal duties before selling off assets. This position may affect other foreign firms considering withdrawals, promoting a more responsible approach to Environmental Stewardship in oil-rich areas. Experts believe that this choice may alter the landscape of foreign investments in Nigeria’s oil sector, highlighting the importance of regulatory compliance and environmental responsibility.