The question of whether Nigeria needs a new state is one that frequently resurfaces in discussions about governance, representation, and development. With 36 states already in existence, some argue that the current structure is sufficient, while others believe that creating additional states could address issues of marginalisation and bring governance closer to the people. This debate is not new, as various ethnic and regional groups have consistently advocated for state creation as a means of securing political and economic benefits. However, the feasibility and effectiveness of such an approach remain highly contested.
One of the main arguments for creating a new state is the issue of political representation. Many ethnic groups and communities feel underrepresented in the current structure, with their interests often overlooked in the larger political landscape. Advocates for state creation argue that a new state could provide these groups with a stronger voice in national affairs and enable them to participate more actively in decision-making processes. This is particularly relevant in regions where dominant ethnic groups wield significant influence, leaving minority communities struggling for recognition and equitable resource allocation.
Many existing states depend heavily on federal allocation.
Another reason often cited in favour of a new state is the potential for economic development. Proponents argue that a new state would lead to improved infrastructure, better resource distribution, and increased government attention. In theory, this could create new opportunities for investment, job creation, and economic growth. However, the counterargument is that many of Nigeria’s existing states already struggle to generate sufficient Revenue and depend heavily on federal allocations. Creating an additional state could place further strain on the National Budget without necessarily delivering the expected economic benefits.
Beyond economic concerns, governance and administrative efficiency are key considerations. While smaller administrative units could, in theory, improve governance, Nigeria’s experience suggests otherwise. Many newly created states have failed to deliver better service delivery, and the stringent requirements in Section 8 of the 1999 Constitution, which demand a two-thirds majority approval at multiple levels, make state creation a daunting challenge. Past attempts have often resulted in higher bureaucratic costs, duplication of government functions, and deeper political tensions over resource control.
State creation does not always mean improved security.
Furthermore, Security is another dimension of the debate. Some argue that a new state could help address security concerns, particularly in regions experiencing ethnic or communal conflicts. They believe that a state tailored to the specific needs of a particular region could improve law enforcement and conflict resolution efforts. However, history has shown that state creation does not necessarily translate to improved security. In many cases, disputes over boundaries, leadership, and resource sharing have led to heightened tensions rather than stability.
On the other hand, rather than creating a new state, some experts suggest that Nigeria should focus on strengthening its existing states. Issues such as poor governance, corruption, and weak institutions have hindered development more than the mere size or number of states. Addressing these structural issues through better resource management, decentralisation of power, and reforms in governance could be more effective in promoting development than simply adding another administrative unit. Additionally, ensuring that local governments function effectively could achieve similar results without the complications associated with state creation.
Related Article: States has received support funds
While the idea of creating a new state in Nigeria might seem appealing to some, the broader implications must be carefully examined. Political representation, economic viability, administrative efficiency, and security are all crucial factors that must be weighed against the challenges of maintaining additional governmental structures. Rather than focusing on state creation as a solution, Nigeria may be better served by improving governance within the existing states and strengthening local institutions. In the end, what the country truly needs is not necessarily more states, but better governance and equitable development across all regions.